It’s been a great year for warrior
princesses at the movies — even better
if they come bearing bow and arrows. First we had Everdeen Katniss, as incarnated
in the svelte, fearless form of Jennifer Lawrence, eyes narrowing as she strung
her bow and sent The Hunger Games $672
million into the black. Everdeen was followed by Snow White, as played by
sullen beauty Kristen Stewart, her sword slicing the air to
save the kingdom of her late father and topple The Avengers from the top spot at the box office. And now we have Pixar’s Brave, boasting
the studio’s first female heroine, flame–haired, cinch-waisted Princess Merida, “dear
and bonny and lovable, the face beautiful, and transfigured with the light of
that lustrous intellect and the fires of that unquenchable spirit.”
So wrote Marc Twain of Joan of Arc but he could as easily have been describing the new breed of warrior
princess riding, fighting, shooting, scything their way across our screens. As Sasha Stone commented at Awards Daily, “it’s hard not to
look at 2012 and not declare it the Year of the Girl.” although these feisty female role models have not met with universal
approval. Merida could have used “a
few more pixels in her waist,” complained Peggy Orenstein, author of Cindarella Ate My Daughters: Dispatches From
the Front Line of the New Girly-Girl Culture. “Merida doesn’t really grow,”
pointed out Mary Pols in Time “She’s
simply extended her time as a tomboy, another archetype, less a girl than a
stereotype of a kind of girl."
Certainly, Disney princesses have been ploughing the
feisty furrow for some time, at least since Princess Jasmine ran away from home
rather than be married off at her father’s behest in 1992’s Aladdin. Jasmine, Pocohontas and Mulan
were all touted, in their time, as “new”, “empowered” Disney heroines who refused
to sit at home plaiting their hair waiting for their prince to come. Clearly, some
stereotypes are better than others, although even calling “stereotypes” in a
Hollywood movie is a fraught activity, given that the semantic overlap between
that and what most screenwriters would call “characterization.” Either way, we
have come a long way from the days when Snow White could arrive at the seven
dwarves home and immediately start house-cleaning without a word of complaint.
In a study conducted at the University
of Connecticut, Dawn England and Lara Descartes divvied up the screen-time of all
eight Disney Princess into three categories, “”domestic work”,
“interacting with animals”, and “other”. They reached the following conclusions:—
“Princesses performing domestic work was only
portrayed in the first three princess movies and again briefly in Pocohontas. However in the first two
movies it occupied a significant amount of time. Time spent interacting with
animals was very prevalent in the first four movies decreased slightly in the
next three, and then significantly increased in Mulan.”
In Pocohontas’ defence, it
should be pointed out that Teepees get messy very quickly without regular
housecleaning, and that Mulan was accompanied throughout much of the
film by a red-and-orange Chinese dragon voiced by Eddie Murphy, who is better better
classified under “comic relief”, perhaps, than “interacting with animals.” But
no matter — onto the Princes, whom they scored for personality traits
ranging from “assertive” to “troublesome” then comparing them with the Princesses
scores:—
“The princesses were significantly more likely to be
cooperative, nurturing, tending to their physical appearance, and troublesome.
While the princesses were not likely to be portrayed as physically strong, unemotional,
or inspiring fear, these characteristics were more common among the princes.
The princes were least likely to tend to their physical appearance.”
(Here Brave
scores very highly, some of its strongest jokes coming at the expense of the young
Scottish Lords all vying for Merida’s hand — a rogue’s gallery of narcissists,
boneheads and Tennis-pro preeners.)
“The Princes were action-oriented, often performing the
climactic rescue that brought the conclusion of the movie. Over time the
princesses roles changed form being completely passive or asleep during the
final rescue to assisting the Princes.”
“Asleep” seems a little harsh on Sleeping Beauty — the
poor girl had hardly nodded off — but perhaps the most surprising observation
was this: —
“Among the princesses, assertiveness was more common
in earlier films and fearfulness and tentativeness were depicted more often in
later films.”
Huh. The modern princesses are more fearful, and less
assertive than their predecessors. And yet, at the same time, they lead the
action more and need rescuing less. What’s that about? After much mulling on
the matter, it occurred to me that this might be a side-effect of greater psychological
verisimilitude coupled with the old Hemingway paradox about the brave man not
being the man without fear but the man who feels fear and still acts. The
princesses are showing more fear because
they were doing more.
It certainly explains why these films have been such
hits, even with boys. Female protagonists means greater asymmetry of battle (they
are outmatched) means greater suspense (they could lose) means bigger thrills
(they must keep their wits about them).Snow White and the Huntsman boasted
enough swords, scimitars, axes, and snares to keep a horde of Hobbits busy for
a month of Sundays, drawing the admiration of none other than James Franco who chivalrously defended Stewart’s performance from its detractors, “she has worked her ass off. Whatever Snow White
may be, Kristen is a warrior queen. Give her the crown.”Or, as
Twain said:—
“Supremely great souls are never lodged in gross
bodies. No brawn, no muscle, could endure the work that their bodies must do;
they do their miracles by the spirit, which has fifty times the strength and
staying power of brawn and muscle. The Napoleons are little, not big; and they
work twenty hours in the twenty-four, and come up fresh, while the big soldiers
with the little hearts faint around them with fatigue. We know what Joan of Arc
was like without asking — merely by what she did. The artist should paint her
spirit — then he could not fail to paint her body aright.”
I just stumbled upon уour websіte and іn aсceѕsiоn сapital to assert that I аcquіге in fact enjoуed accοunt your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.
This is a very good tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere. Brief but very precise information… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!
“A master-class‑–immersive, detailed, meticulous, privileged inside-dope… Tom Shone is the king of critical cool.” — Craig Raine
“An up-close and personal look at one of Hollywood’s most successful directors…This erudite book is packed with extensive, expansive discussions about Nolan’s films… insights into what he was trying to accomplish with each film; and the movies, directors, books, art, architecture, and music that influenced him…. Fans of Nolan’s films will find this revealing book invaluable.” — Kirkus, starred review
THE NOLAN VARIATIONS
Follow me on Instagram
"Shone is simply one of the most eloquent and acute film writers we have" — Teddy Jamieson, The Sunday Herald
"Shone is a clever film columnist who can also write a wise book: two attributes that don't often go together." — Clive James
"Is there anyone now writing about movies better than Tom Shone? I think not” — John Heilemann, New York magazine
B O O K S
BEST MOVIES of 2018
1 The Irishman A
2. The Souvenir A
3.Marriage Story A-
4. Once Upon A Time in Hollywood A-
5. Apollo 11 A-
6. Parasite A-
7. Ford vs Ferrari
8. Toy Story 4 A-
9. Ad Astra B+
10. For Sama B+
B O O K S
R E V I E W S
"This level of discernment and tart dissent is an unexpected treat... Shone's prose has a beauty of it's own, abounding in nonchalantly exquisite turns of phrase" — Guy Lodge, The Observer
"Sharp, smart... Shone doesn't just follow critical orthodoxies. He makes his argument beautifully. It's the brain food Allen's rich career deserves." — Ian Freer, Empire
"The book is a must for Woody Allen fans" - Joe Meyers, Connecticut Post
.
R E V I E W S
"What makes the book worth taking home, however, is the excellent text... by Tom Shone, a film critic worth reading whatever aspect of the film industry he talks about. (His book Blockbuster is a must).... Most critics are at their best when speaking the language of derision but Shone has the precious gift of being carried away in a sensible manner, and of begin celebratory without setting your teeth on edge." — Clive James, Prospect "The real draw here is Shone’s text, which tells the stories behind the pictures with intelligence and grace. It’s that rarest of creatures: a coffee-table book that’s also a helluva good read." — Jason Bailey, Flavorwire
"There’s a danger of drifting into blandness with this picture packed, coffee-table format. Shone is too vigorous a critic not to put up a fight. He calls Gangs “heartbreaking in the way that only missed masterpieces can be: raging, wounded, incomplete, galvanised by sallies of wild invention”. There’s lots of jazzy, thumbnail writing of this kind... Shone on the “rich, strange and unfathomable” Taxi Driver (1976) cuts to the essence of what Scorsese is capable of." — Tim Robey, The Sunday Telegraph
"A beautiful book on the Taxi Driver director's career by former Sunday Times film critic Tom Shone who relishes Scorsese's "energetic winding riffs that mix cinema history and personal reminiscence".' — Kate Muir,The Times "No mere coffee table book. Shone expertly guides us through Scorsese’s long career.... Shone shows a fine appreciation of his subject, too. Describing Taxi Driver (1976) as having ‘the stillness of a cobra’ is both pithy and apposite.... Fascinating stuff." — Michael Doherty, RTE Guide"An admiring but clear-eyed view of the great American filmmaker’s career... Shone gives the book the heft of a smart critical biography... his arguments are always strong and his insights are fresh. The oversized book’s beauty is matched by its brains”— Connecticut Post
.
Click to order
“The film book of the year.... enthralling... groundbreaking.” — The Daily Telegraph
“Blockbuster is weirdly humane: it prizes entertainment over boredom, and audiences over critics, and yet it’s a work of great critical intelligence” – Nick Hornby, The Believer
“Beautifully written and very funny... I loved it and didn’t want it to end.” – Helen Fielding “[An] impressively learned narrative... approachable and enlightening... Shone evinces an intuitive knowledge of what makes audiences respond... One of those rare film books that walks the fine line between populist tub-thumping and sky-is-falling, Sontag-esque screed.” – Kirkus Reviews
“Exhilarating.... wit, style and a good deal of cheeky scorn for the opinions of bien-pensant liberal intellectuals.” – Phillip French, Times Literary Supplement
“Startlingly original... his ability to sum up an actor or director in one well-turned phrase is reminiscent of Pauline Kael’s... the first and last word on the subject. For anyone interested in film, this book is a must read.” – Toby Young, The Spectator
“A history of caring” – Louis Menand, The New Yorker “Smart, observant… nuanced and original, a conversation between the kid who saw Star Wars a couple dozen times and the adult who's starting to think that a handful might have sufficed.” – Chris Tamarri, The Village Voice
"A sweet and savvy page-turner of a valentine to New York, the strange world of fiction, the pleasures of a tall, full glass and just about everything else that matters" — Gary Shteyngart, author of Super Sad True Love Story and Absurdistan
"A cocktail with bite. I downed it in one" — Helen Fielding, author of Bridget Jones's Diary
"A deft, witty satire which casts its sharp eye over the absurdities of addiction, recovery and contemporary New York" — Marcel Theroux, author of Far North
“Laugh-out-loud funny” — Toby Young, author of How to Lose Friends and Alienate People
"Tom Shone's superb debut is a wise and witty examination of literary celebrity, Anglo-American mystification and the cult of recovery. Shone's prose sparkles: his humor detonates smart-bombs of truth" — Stephen Amidon, author of Human Capital
“A cutting comic debut” — The Sunday Times
“Clever, witty, acerbic, warm” — Geoff Nicholson, author of Footsucker
"A sharp, funny, and ultimately touching debut novel" — Library Journal Reviews
"One of the few novels set in Manhattan that gives you a true feel for the city” — James Wolcott, Vanity Fair
"A splash of cynicism, a dash of self-doubt, and a good measure of humour.... In the Rooms is an entertaining page-turner about humanity, with plenty of hilarity" — The Economist
SEAN BAKER'S (AND MIKEY MADISON'S) ANORA
-
Way back in May it was that Patty, Emma and I drove to the SEE Film
Multiplex in Bremerton to take in *I Saw the TV Glow*, and while there I
took a ...
Happy Birthday Elliott Gould
-
Happy Birthday to one of the all-time greats and one of the coolest of the
cool Elliott Gould. From my 2019 New Beverly interview with Elliott Gould
about ...
National Silent Movie Day: Manhandled (1924)
-
Wednesday, Sept. 29, 2021, is National Silent Movie Day. New York City's
beloved Film Forum is celebrating with a screening of Allan Dwan's 1924
silent...
The King Vidor File – Part Two
-
This part consists of comments on some of his finest and most popular work,
including The Big Parade, The Champ, and Street Scene, as well as one of
his mo...
The Years Of Writing Dangerously
-
Thirteen years ago, as I was starting to experiment with this blogging
thing, I wrote the following: [T]he speed with which an idea in your head
reaches th...
Hello, its good paragraph regarding media print,
ReplyDeletewe all understand media is a enormous source of facts.
Also visit my webpage ... Zebra 2824
Also see my website :: Zebra 2824
I know this web page offers quality dependent articles or
ReplyDeletereviews and extra information, is there any other website which
gives these data in quality?
Feel free to surf to my blog; rent bar code scanners
My website :: rent barcode scanners
Attractive ѕection οf сοntеnt.
ReplyDeleteI just stumbled upon уour websіte
and іn aсceѕsiоn сapital to
assert that I аcquіге in fact enjoуed accοunt
your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.
My homepage - auto loans for bad credit
This is a very good tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere.
ReplyDeleteBrief but very precise information… Thanks for sharing this one.
A must read post!
my homepage - Www.tonystainsbury.co.uk
Hmm is anyone else having problems with the images on this blog loading?
ReplyDeleteI'm trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it's the
blog. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
My blog ... https://Vle.um.edu.mt