Jun 10, 2012

REVIEW: Prometheus (dir. Scott)


One of the things I love about Alien was the imaginative effort it took to live up to its title. Unlike so many past attempts to imagine aliens and their worlds, Scott's gyno-shocker-masterpiece presented us with something that seemed genuinely other, exotic, non-human. It seemed alien. From the Giger-designed creature itself  — eyeless, with an extended cranium, and its endless sets of jaws-with-jaws — to the space wreck in which we first found it, with its rack-of-rib-lined corridors and fallopian-tube doorways, the film presented us with a queasily beautiful mixture of the mechanical and the organic, like a cross between a cathedral and a quadruple bypass operation.  Scott's new movie, Prometheus, blithely undoes all that, reconverting all that foreignness back into the reliably humanoid.  The space jockey is just a suit; underneath it looks just like a human, or to be more specific, a glow-in-the-dark ancient Greek, entombed in a room of ancient hieroglyphs. Here is Scott:—
“[I've wanted to revisit it for] years! Years, years, years… I always wondered when they did [Aliens] 2,3 and 4 why they hadn’t touched upon that, instead of evolving into some other fantastic story. They missed the biggest question of them all: who’s the big guy? And where were they going? And with what? Why that cargo? There’s all kinds of questions.”
Why did the other directors pass up on the space jockey? Why would anyone want to make a film about Hannibal Lecter's last victim but one? Who cares? That lordly condescension towards the other directors in the series is what tips the wink as to what he is really up to here: it's a pissing war, with Sir Ridley come to reclaim what is rightfully his and reproclaim himself lord of the manor. He has made one of the most expensive category errors in the history of movies — gussying up a fragment of McGuffin like a Faberge egg. Trust Scott to mistake a beautiful detail for an entire movie: his films are nothing but details. Larded with mythopeic themes and pseudo-religious pontification, the film is inferior to its predecessors in every way save that of hardware and landscapes — we get one of the best-looking space ships ever put to film, plus some fabulous, roiling skyscapes once we touch down — although it begs the question dodged by Lucas with his Star Wars prequels, namely: how come the technology is more sophisticated than that seen in the first film? After Alien's revolutionary experiment in post-industrial grunge, we're back to shiny, silver space-suits. In tone, Prometheus is actually rather similar to Dan O Bannon's script for Alien before Walter Hill got his hands on it. There were pyramids, and holograms, and an all-male cast, who spoke at length about “what should be done” in stiff, officer-class locutions,  but never got around to doing very much:—
STANDARD steps forward and slaps ROBY across the face.
The others are shocked.
HUNTER: Hey now, what is this?
STANDARD: Ask him.
ROBY: I understood why you did that.
STANDARD: Good...
After a hard stare at Roby, Standard give him a curt nod and turns his attention to the machinery.
It read like The Last Days of the British Raj  — all curt nods, hard stares and stiff upper lips in space. “It had not even B-picture merit,” said Hill.  “Nobody could take it seriously. It had a ‘Jesus gadzooks’ quality about it”.  Hill dropped the pyramids, introduced a computer called mother, made two of the characters women, introduced a note of oily class warfare between the officers and the working-class crew, and streamlined the whole thing with his headlong, hard-boiled style — somewhere  between  “staccato and blank verse”:—
A red stain.
Then a smear of blood blossoms on his chest.
The fabric of his tunic is ripped open.
 A small head the size of a man’s fist pushes out.
The tiny head lunges forward, comes spurting out of Dallas’s chest trailing a thick body.
Spatters fluids and blood in its wake.
Lands in the middle of the dishes and food.
Wriggles away while the crew scatters. 
What Scott and writer Damon Lindelof have done is reconvert the Alien franchise back into its Gadzooks phase: there are pyramids and holograms and stiff office-class locutions from an icy Charlize Theron — a one-woman repository of curt nods and hard stares. We even get a nod to David Lean, courtesy of David the android's obsession with Lawrence of Arabia: all very interesting, if you buy into the idea of Scott as a purveyor of high-quality epic, but I longed for a burst of Hill's hard-charging rhino momentumScott has made it clear that his isn't quite a prequel in the normal sense, but a film which incorporates "the DNA" of the series, which is a fancy way of saying he wants to prod the franchise for every viscous drip — we get no less than four types of alien creature, a self-inflicted birth, more milky-blooded androids — without the discipline involved in cleaving to its rules. It takes a giant crap in the space helmet of the series. Turns out: when John Hurt lands on the alien planet* at the beginning of Alien, he need only have rolled that ship over an inch and he would have found the flattened form of Charlize Theron. And the alien is really the grand-child of the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. No.  C- 
* Some kind souls on Twitter have pointed out to me that Scott has set this on a different planet to the one we see in Alien. To which I can only say: excuse me? You mean to say that Scott's own stated reason for making the film — to show us who the space jockey was, where that crashed spaceship came from and why it contained alien eggs — that was all a feint, too? We're not even scratching that itch?

6 comments:

  1. Thanks for an interesting perspective on the film. I didn't know anything about the history of the Alien script, and there does seem to be some plausibility to the suggestion that Prometheus is a return to the mindset of the original Alien script, whether by intent, laziness or other.

    I am surprised by the extent to which everyone is focusing on Prometheus' negatives though. Yes the human origins part of the story is scientic and philosophical nonsense, yes most of the cast are throwaway with unclear motivations, yes the scientists behave like dolts and the aliens' iterations are fairly baffling, but for me all of this is outweighed by the film's positives, namely the beauty of the artistic vision, and the mindbendingly chilling effectiveness of the alien horror. In Alien, most of the fear in the whole second half of the film comes simply from not knowing where the creature is going to pop up next, because the story is limited to a single creature; in Prometheus, the fear comes from not having any idea what the hell is going to happen next, because Scott does a great job of conveying the compassionless inhumanity of not only the aliens in their various guises, but also the 'engineers', the android, and perhaps even some of the human cast. I disagree with your thoughts on the alienness of the two films. Maybe the design of Alien is more alien, but the tone of Prometheus was for me far more alien. No other film has ever conveyed to me so effectively the unknowable terror of non-human consciousness like Prometheus, and that for me is why it is ultimately very successful as a horror film.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why do all the PROmetheus reviews sound the same - Yes, it was badly written, idiotic, had terrible characters and dialogue and didn't make a lick of sense, but it looks fantastic. All those first things- kinda a deal breaker for the general viewing public.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great to read a piece which points to Hill (as well as Giger) as being one of Alien's ultimate progenitors. Every other Ridley Scott film has suffered from extraordinary narrative messiness, and Prometheus wouldn't have stood out as more or less silly than the rest if it wasn't for the hubris of placing it up against the best thing he's ever done. I can only imagine what Hill said when he saw it...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Admiгing the haгd worκ you ρut
    into your site аnd іn dеpth information you рrеsеnt.
    It's great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't the sаme outԁated rehashed infогmation.

    Wоndeгful гead! I've bookmarked your site and I'm inсluding your RSS feeds to my Gоοgle acсount.



    Feel frеe tο surf to mу pаge ::
    Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete
  5. Υοu neеԁ to bе a раrt of a contеst for one of
    the bеѕt sites on thе web. Ӏ am
    goіng tо highly recommend thіs web site!


    Stορ by my sіte ... New Bingo Sites

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello, I enϳοy readіng through your article.
    I ωanted to wrіte a little comment to support you.



    Check out my weblog: payday loans

    ReplyDelete