skip to main |
skip to sidebar
REVIEW: OLDBOY (dir. Lee)
From my Guardian review:
Spike Lee’s Oldboy
is as far from a Spike Lee Joint as could be imagined. It’s actually a Park
Chan-Wook joint — a remake of Chan-Wook's 2003 South Korean cult
classic about a man held in solitary confinement for 20 years before being
loosing to wreak vengeance on his captors. Adapted from a manga comic-book,
which was in turn adapted from an over-whelming desire to see what damage hammers
do to foreheads, Chan-Wook’s film was a matte-black vengeance riff, decked out
in playful camera angles, sicko violence, and one live octopus, which it’s hero
ate, still wriggling, in one scene, although I like the think that afterwards,
its cameo over, the octopus simply called “cut!” and resumed its position
behind the camera.
What drew the maker of Do The Right Thing, Malcolm
X, and Clockers to resolving this
Rubik’s cube is anyone’s guess. In Lee’s version, Josh Brolin plays Joe
Doucette, a two-bit ad exec who wakes up after an alcoholic bender in a motel
room, and remains locked up there for the next 20 years.
He has no idea who is captors are, only that they feed him a thoughtful tray of
dim-sum and vodka every day, and pay the cable bills on time, so that Joe can
watch his wife’s murder being pinned on him in his absence, a succession of
presidents being sworn in, and — as luck would have it — a series of
martial arts programs, which come in very handy when one day, he wakes up in a
field, sporting a new buzzcut, a newly toned body, an iPhone and a headful of
vengeance. Game on.
Quite literally. Like Chan-Wook’s original, Lee’s
film, with its vivid rendings of the flesh — by box cutter and hammer
— and challenge-level plotting, has the maziness of a video game. Joe’s
tormentor (Sharlto Copley), is with him every step of the way, helpfully phoning
in clues that will enable him to solve the mystery — “Who I am and why did I imprison you?” — even
throwing in an extra hostage for “a little added motivation,” when the plot
needs a freshener. And if that sounds to you suspiciously like a screenwriter
outsourcing his dramatic duties to his villain, then give yourself a gold star.
I grew tired of these screenwriter-ex-machina bad guys, with
their chummy phone manner and tedious riddles, around the time they first appeared:
it’s been downhill since Speed,
basically. Once a villain starts
tailoring his plot so specifically to the dramatic needs of the film around
him, you know it’s going to end in one of two ways, either 1) an “I-am-he-as-you-are-he-as-you-are-me” fudge, or 2) a vast import of
new expository material.'
No comments:
Post a Comment